|Cost per Month ($)|
|Disk Space (GB)|
|Data Transfer (GB)|
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and can be made of one or more of the metrics generated during the tests.
Grade A is best, grade F is worst.
|Raw CPU Power|
|Disk IO Performance|
The grades above are based on the following test results.
We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on VPSs from Crissic and BudgetVM. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
|Provider||Plan||Average response time|
During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.
Features not included in the VPS price in plans tested at vpsbenchmarks.com will be marked as missing.
hostbenchmarker.com: shared hosting benchmarks, where you can see results of speed tests, uptime reliability, and tech support response times.
All vpsbenchmarks.com trials are conducted without the knowledge and without sponsorship from the provider of the VPS where the benchmarked application is running.
To support VpsBenchmarks, make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Links displayed on the site.
To this days all first tier cloud providers have taken action against the Spectre and Meltdown ...
All tests that were conducted at VpsBenchmarks: