HostPapa vs Ramnode

HostPapa
Ramnode
Last updated on

We have tested 4 VPS plans from HostPapa and Ramnode. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.


HostPapa

HostPapa was founded in 2006.
It is headquartered in Canada.
It offers Web, Shared, Wordpress and VPS hosting products.

Ramnode

Ramnode was founded in 2012.
It is headquartered in the USA.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Netherlands
  • USA

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
KVM SSD Standard 1GB $5.00 2 1.0 35 2000 Mar 07 2020
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB $7.00 2 2.0 60 2000 Jan 13 2020
KVM Premium 2GB $12.00 1 2.0 50 3000 May 18 2020
VPS Plus $49.99 4 1.5 50 1000 Jun 27 2019

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
KVM SSD Standard 1GB
$5.00
D D D C E
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB
$7.00
E D D A D
KVM Premium 2GB
$12.00
B D B D D
VPS Plus
$49.99
E B C F D
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for HostPapa and Ramnode from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

HostPapa Ramnode
Number of instance creations in sample 1 6
Provisioning time in seconds 3600s 26s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.


Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from HostPapa and Ramnode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average response time
Ramnode
KVM Premium 2GB 44.1ms
KVM SSD Standard 1GB 74.3ms
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 81.7ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.


Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of HostPapa and Ramnode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan Operations per second
Ramnode
KVM Premium 2GB 473.8
KVM SSD Standard 1GB 508.7
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 564.5
HostPapa
VPS Plus 1143.6

Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of HostPapa and Ramnode. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan MiB per second
Ramnode
KVM SSD Standard 1GB 34.0
KVM Premium 2GB 46.3
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 328.8
HostPapa
VPS Plus 2.7

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for HostPapa and Ramnode.


Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the HostPapa and Ramnode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Plan Network Download Speed
Ramnode
KVM SSD Standard 1GB 323.8Mbps
KVM Premium 2GB 509.1Mbps
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 527.3Mbps
HostPapa
VPS Plus 456.3Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for HostPapa and Ramnode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.


Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.


Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Plan Average ops/hour
Ramnode
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 2421.3
KVM SSD Standard 1GB 2574.6
KVM Premium 2GB 3153.2
HostPapa
VPS Plus 3693.4

Review and compare endurance test results for HostPapa and Ramnode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.


Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).


Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average remote request duration
Ramnode
OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB 327.0ms
HostPapa
VPS Plus 353.8ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for HostPapa and Ramnode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.


Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.

Ramnode Review HostPapa Review
Hourly Billing  Mixed No
DDOS Protection  No Yes
Backups  No Yes
Control Panel  fleio WHMCS + SolusVM
SSH Keys Setup  Yes No
Total Number of Datacenters  5 1
Number of Datacenter Continents  2 1
Compare more HostPapa and Ramnode Features

Screenshots


Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.




Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $2.0.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Screener

Best VPS 2020


Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks

News

First EC2 C5a EPYC 2nd Gen benchmarks On June 5th 2020, Amazon EC2 made their new C5a instances generally available. Those instances are ...
New VDS line of servers at Contabo This week, [Contabo](/hosters/contabo) is releasing a new line of VPS servers called [VDS "Virtual ...
New Grades and Best VPS 2020 rankings Changes are coming to VPSBenchmarks in the next few weeks that will make it easier to find the VPS ...

More...

Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up

Disclaimer

We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way regardless of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by making your cloud purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Jul 02 2020 Clouding.io
Jun 30 2020 Alibaba Cloud
Jun 28 2020 VPS2DAY
Jun 26 2020 Hostinger
Jun 24 2020 Genesis Public Cloud
Jun 22 2020 Kamatera
Jun 20 2020 Vultr
Jun 17 2020 Aruba Cloud
Jun 15 2020 UpCloud
Jun 12 2020 MaxKVM
Jun 10 2020 Dreamhost
Jun 08 2020 DigitalOcean