LayerStack vs MaxKVM
We have tested 3 VPS plans from LayerStack and MaxKVM. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.
LayerStack
LayerStack was founded in 2017.
It is headquartered in Hong Kong.
It offers VPS hosting products.
- China
- Japan
- Singapore
- United States
MaxKVM
MaxKVM was founded in 2008.
It is headquartered in the USA.
It offers VPS hosting products.
- Netherlands
- United States
VPS Plans
| Plan Name | Monthly Price | CPU cores | Memory (GB) | Disk Space (GB) | Data Transfer (GB) | Latest trial | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKVM-4G | $12.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 75 | 3000 | Jul 29 2020 |
|
|
PKVM-8G | $15.00 | 4 | 8.0 | 125 | 10000 | Jun 12 2020 |
|
R108-HK | $28.06 | 2 | 4.0 | 150 | 5000 | Jul 24 2020 |
Performance Grades
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.
Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.
Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.
VPS Instance Provisioning Time
This is the average time it took to create an instance for LayerStack and MaxKVM from instance order to instance accepting connections.
| LayerStack | MaxKVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of instance creations in sample | 1 | 1 |
| Provisioning time in seconds | 40s | 25s |
In Depth...
The grades above are based on the following test results.
Web Response Times
We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from LayerStack and MaxKVM. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.
Sysbench CPU Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of LayerStack and MaxKVM. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Sysbench Disk IO Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of LayerStack and MaxKVM. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for LayerStack and MaxKVM.
Network Transfers
We have performed large file transfers from the LayerStack and MaxKVM VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.
The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.
Download Speed per Plan
Higher is better
| Plan | Network Download Speed |
|---|---|
|
MaxKVM |
|
| PKVM-8G | 302.2Mbps |
| SKVM-4G | 912.7Mbps |
|
LayerStack |
|
| R108-HK | 1681.8Mbps |
Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for LayerStack and MaxKVM on the Network Transfers Comparison page.
Sustained CPU Endurance Tests
We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.
This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.
Average number of operations per hour
Higher is better
Review and compare endurance test results for LayerStack and MaxKVM on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.
Remote Timings
During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).
Remote Latency per Plan
Lower is better
| Plan | Average remote request duration |
|---|
Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for LayerStack and MaxKVM on the Remote Timings Comparison page.
Features and Usability
Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.
| MaxKVM Review | LayerStack Review | |
|---|---|---|
| Hourly Billing | No | No |
| DDOS Protection | Yes | No |
| Backups | No | No |
| Control Panel | WHMCS, SolusVM | Custom |
| SSH Keys Setup | No | Yes |
| Total Number of Datacenters | 4 | 4 |
| Number of Datacenter Continents | 2 | 2 |
Screenshots
Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?
Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.
Compare LayerStack and MaxKVM against other providers
Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers
With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.
Run your first Private Trial for just $2.0.
Screeners
Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-09 22:39:37 UTCNew trial started for Scaleway DEV1-M: €9.99 #VPS, 3 cores, 4.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/scalewa… #cloudcomputing![]()
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-09 00:26:06 UTCAll tests results are in for RamNode OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB: $7.00 #VPS, 2 cores, 2.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/ramnode… #cloudcomputing![]()
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-07 23:19:57 UTCNew trial started for RamNode OpenVZ SSD Standard 2GB: $7.00 #VPS, 2 cores, 2.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/ramnode… #cloudcomputing![]()
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-07 22:51:02 UTCAll tests results are in for Kamatera Availability 16GB 8 cores: $99.00 #VPS, 8 cores, 16.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/kamater… #cloudcomputing![]()
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-06 21:12:41 UTCNew trial started for Kamatera Availability 16GB 8 cores: $99.00 #VPS, 8 cores, 16.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/kamater… #cloudcomputing![]()
-
VPSBenchmarks
2020-08-06 00:32:11 UTCScreen cloud providers for the features that you need using the Cloud Provider Finder vpsbenchmarks.com/hosters![]()
News
First EC2 C5a EPYC 2nd Gen benchmarks On June 5th 2020, Amazon EC2 made their new C5a instances generally available. Those instances are ...
New VDS line of servers at Contabo This week, Contabo is releasing a new line of VPS servers called VDS "Virtual ...
Disclaimer
We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way regardless of our relationships with them.
If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by making your cloud purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.
Latest trials
All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:
| Start | Provider |
|---|---|
| Aug 09 2020 | Scaleway |
| Aug 07 2020 | Ramnode |
| Aug 06 2020 | Kamatera |
| Aug 04 2020 | Aruba Cloud |
| Aug 03 2020 | Togglebox |
| Aug 02 2020 | Vultr |
| Jul 30 2020 | UpCloud |
| Jul 29 2020 | MaxKVM |
| Jul 27 2020 | Genesis VMs |
| Jul 26 2020 | Amazon EC2 |
| Jul 24 2020 | LayerStack |
| Jul 21 2020 | Google Compute Engine |