DigitalOcean vs LunaNode

DOcean
LunaNode
Last updated on

We have tested 10 VPS plans from DigitalOcean and LunaNode. This page is a summary and comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.


DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean was founded in 2012.
It is headquartered in the USA.
It offers VPS, Database, Storage and Networking hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • India
  • Netherlands
  • Singapore
  • UK
  • USA

LunaNode

LunaNode was founded in 2013.
It is headquartered in Canada.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • France

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
Standard 1GB 1 core $5.00 1 1.0 25 1000 Jan 06 2020
s.1 $7.00 2 1.0 20 2000 Feb 09 2020
Standard 2GB 1 core $10.00 1 2.0 50 2000 Jun 14 2019
s.2 $14.00 4 2.0 35 2500 Dec 16 2019
m.4 $14.00 2 4.0 35 2500 Mar 31 2020
Standard 1GB 3 cores $15.00 3 1.0 60 3000 Aug 26 2019
Standard 4GB 2 cores $20.00 2 4.0 80 4000 Nov 06 2019
c.1 $20.00 1 5.0 100 3000 Oct 15 2019
CPU Optimized 4GB $40.00 2 4.0 25 4000 Feb 29 2020
General Purpose 2 cores $60.00 2 8.0 25 4000 Apr 05 2019

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
Standard 1GB 1 core
$5.00
C D C D B
s.1
$7.00
C C C B D
Standard 2GB 1 core
$10.00
E D D E C
s.2
$14.00
C A C C C
m.4
$14.00
D C C C D
Standard 1GB 3 cores
$15.00
D B D D D
Standard 4GB 2 cores
$20.00
C B B C C
c.1
$20.00
F E D D D
CPU Optimized 4GB
$40.00
B D D C B
General Purpose 2 cores
$60.00
B B E B D
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for DigitalOcean and LunaNode from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

DigitalOcean LunaNode
Number of instance creations in sample 9 8
Provisioning time in seconds 27s 43s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.


Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from DigitalOcean and LunaNode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average response time
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 78.0ms
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 105.0ms
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 83.0ms
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 73.0ms
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 71.0ms
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 57.0ms
LunaNode s.1 74.0ms
LunaNode s.2 74.0ms
LunaNode m.4 80.0ms
LunaNode c.1 101.0ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.


Sysbench CPU Performances

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of DigitalOcean and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Provider Plan Operations per second
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 363.2
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 395.6
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 1012.5
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 761.8
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 605.5
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 929.2
LunaNode s.1 785.9
LunaNode s.2 1588.9
LunaNode m.4 758.7
LunaNode c.1 329.3

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for DigitalOcean and LunaNode.


Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).


Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average remote request duration
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 327.6ms
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 359.0ms
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 326.0ms
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 334.0ms
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 333.2ms
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 370.2ms
LunaNode s.1 431.0ms
LunaNode s.2 366.4ms
LunaNode m.4 373.8ms
LunaNode c.1 378.6ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.


Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the DigitalOcean and LunaNode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Provider Plan Network Download Speed
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 899.9Mbps
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 658.8Mbps
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 211.8Mbps
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 758.5Mbps
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 1447.7Mbps
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 404.1Mbps
LunaNode s.1 600.3Mbps
LunaNode s.2 592.3Mbps
LunaNode m.4 525.8Mbps
LunaNode c.1 387.5Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.


Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.


Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Provider Plan Average ops/hour
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 3059.2
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 2549.0
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 5835.2
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 4153.1
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 2065.6
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 3709.1
LunaNode s.1 2776.1
LunaNode s.2 5881.9
LunaNode m.4 2681.9
LunaNode c.1 1239.0

Review and compare endurance test results for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.


Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.

DigitalOcean Review LunaNode Review
Hourly Billing  Yes Yes
DDOS Protection  No No
Backups  No Yes
Control Panel  Builtin Custom
SSH Keys Setup  Yes Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  12 3
Number of Datacenter Continents  3 2
Compare more DigitalOcean and LunaNode Features

Screenshots


Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.




Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $2.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Screener

Best VPS Fall 2019


Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks

News

Best VPS for $10 or less

List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.


Private Trials: VPSBenchmarks on your Servers

It is now possible to run the same benchmarks familiar to all visitors of vpsbenchmarks.com on your ...


Vultr High Frequency Compute Instances

On June 10th 2019, Vultr announced the launch of [high frequency compute ...


Performance of burstable CPU VM instances

Burstable CPUs VM instances appeared on Amazon EC2 for the first time in 2014. Since then, they have...

More...

Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up

Disclaimer

We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way for all providers irrespective of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Apr 02 2020 Hetzner
Mar 31 2020 LunaNode
Mar 29 2020 Linode
Mar 27 2020 Genesis Public Cloud
Mar 25 2020 CloudSigma
Mar 23 2020 Aruba Cloud
Mar 21 2020 Microsoft Azure
Mar 19 2020 Vultr
Mar 17 2020 Kamatera
Mar 15 2020 Alibaba Cloud
Mar 13 2020 Dreamhost
Mar 11 2020 VPS2DAY