Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.

DigitalOcean vs LunaNode

DigitalOcean
LunaNode

Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
DigitalOcean Standard 1GB 1 core $5.00 1 1.0 25 1000 Dec 03 2018
LunaNode s.1 $7.00 2 1.0 20 2000 Jan 07 2019
DigitalOcean Standard 2GB 1 core $10.00 1 2.0 50 2000 Jun 14 2019
LunaNode s.2 $14.00 4 2.0 35 2500 Mar 04 2019
DigitalOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores $15.00 3 1.0 60 3000 Jul 08 2018
DigitalOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores $20.00 2 4.0 80 4000 Oct 25 2018
LunaNode c.1 $20.00 1 5.0 100 3000 May 13 2019
DigitalOcean CPU Optimized 4GB $40.00 2 4.0 25 4000 Feb 03 2019
DigitalOcean General Purpose 2 cores $60.00 2 8.0 25 4000 Apr 05 2019

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and can be made of one or more of the metrics generated during the tests.

Grade A is best, grade F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Performance Raw CPU Power Performance Stability Disk IO Performance Network Performance
DigitalOcean CPU Optimized 4GB B B C B C
DigitalOcean General Purpose 2 cores B B E B D
DigitalOcean Standard 1GB 1 core D D C D B
DigitalOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores D B D D B
DigitalOcean Standard 2GB 1 core F D D E C
DigitalOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores B B D B B
LunaNode c.1 E E D D D
LunaNode s.1 C C C B C
LunaNode s.2 C A E B C
Show Price Weighted Grades   

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.


Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on VPSs from DigitalOcean and LunaNode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average response time
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 73.0ms
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 105.0ms
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 76.0ms
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 55.0ms
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 52.0ms
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 57.0ms
LunaNode s.1 67.0ms
LunaNode s.2 66.0ms
LunaNode c.1 101.0ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.


Sysbench CPU Performances

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of DigitalOcean and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Provider Plan Operations per second
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 397.8
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 395.6
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 744.9
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 913.0
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 929.2
LunaNode s.1 784.9
LunaNode s.2 1602.1
LunaNode c.1 330.4

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for DigitalOcean and LunaNode.


Remote Timings

During the whole duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the average connection + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations.


Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average remote request duration
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 361.8ms
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 359.0ms
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 342.4ms
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 340.8ms
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 364.8ms
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 370.2ms
LunaNode s.1 385.4ms
LunaNode s.2 373.2ms
LunaNode c.1 388.4ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.


Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the DigitalOcean and LunaNode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Provider Plan Network Download Speed
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 1390.9Mbps
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 658.8Mbps
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 1451.3Mbps
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 1400.3Mbps
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 567.4Mbps
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 404.1Mbps
LunaNode s.1 751.1Mbps
LunaNode s.2 532.9Mbps
LunaNode c.1 405.6Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.


Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans very hard for 24 hours straight.

This kind of tests shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs are.


Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Provider Plan Average ops/hour
DOcean Standard 1GB 1 core 3023.6
DOcean Standard 2GB 1 core 2549.0
DOcean Standard 1GB 3 cores 3819.9
DOcean Standard 4GB 2 cores 5959.0
DOcean CPU Optimized 4GB 7659.7
DOcean General Purpose 2 cores 3709.1
LunaNode s.1 3267.2
LunaNode s.2 5933.1
LunaNode c.1 1327.8

Review and compare endurance test results for DigitalOcean and LunaNode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.


Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price in plans tested at vpsbenchmarks.com will be marked as missing.

DigitalOcean Review LunaNode Review
Hourly Billing  Yes Yes
DDOS Protection  No No
Backups  No Yes
Control Panel  Builtin Custom
SSH Keys Setup  Yes Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  7 3
Number of Datacenter Continents  3 2





Select 2 providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Screener

Best VPS Winter 2019

Share this page


Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks

News

Best VPS for $10 or less

List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.


Vultr High Frequency Compute Instances

On June 10th 2019, Vultr announced the launch of [high frequency compute ...


Performance of burstable CPU VM instances

Burstable CPUs VM instances appeared on Amazon EC2 for the first time in 2014. Since then, they have...


Evaluating cloud server performance with sysbench

Finding the best cloud servers for your use case can be challenging. Most providers offer a number ...

More...

Partners

vpsbenchmarks.com is hosted by:

Cheap Powerful VPS

Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up

Disclaimer

We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website, all VPSBenchmarks tests are conducted the same way for all Cloud providers whether or not we are affilates with them.

To support us, make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Links displayed throughout the site.


Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Jun 24 2019 1and1 IONOS
Jun 21 2019 Vultr
Jun 17 2019 Alibaba Cloud
Jun 14 2019 DigitalOcean
Jun 10 2019 UpCloud
Jun 07 2019 Scaleway
Jun 03 2019 Amazon EC2
May 31 2019 Google Compute Engine
May 27 2019 Ramnode
May 24 2019 OVH Public Cloud
May 21 2019 Kamatera
May 19 2019 Amazon Lightsail