vs LunaNode

Last updated on

We have tested 10 VPS plans from and LunaNode. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those 2 providers. was founded in 2014.
It is headquartered in Spain.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Spain


LunaNode was founded in 2013.
It is headquartered in Canada.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • France

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
1GB 0.5 core €5.00 1 1.0 25 2000 May 06 2020
s.1 $7.00 2 1.0 20 2000 Feb 09 2020
2GB 1 core €8.00 1 2.0 30 2000 Mar 02 2020
s.2 $14.00 4 2.0 35 2500 Dec 16 2019
m.4 $14.00 2 4.0 35 2500 Mar 31 2020
4GB 2 cores €16.00 2 4.0 60 2000 May 25 2020
c.1 $20.00 1 5.0 100 3000 Oct 15 2019
m.8 $28.00 4 8.0 70 3000 May 05 2020
8GB 4 cores €30.00 4 8.0 100 2000 Apr 10 2020
12GB 6 cores €40.00 6 12.0 100 2000 Jan 18 2020

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
1GB 0.5 core
2GB 1 core
4GB 2 cores
8GB 4 cores
12GB 6 cores
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for and LunaNode from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times LunaNode
Number of instance creations in sample 10 9
Provisioning time in seconds 53s 43s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.

Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from and LunaNode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.

Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average response time
2GB 1 core 46.5ms
4GB 2 cores 47.4ms
8GB 4 cores 50.0ms
1GB 0.5 core 64.0ms
12GB 6 cores 64.4ms
m.8 67.7ms
s.1 70.2ms
m.4 70.4ms
s.2 72.5ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.

Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:

Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan Operations per second
1GB 0.5 core 322.9
2GB 1 core 427.4
4GB 2 cores 1259.2
8GB 4 cores 1732.6
12GB 6 cores 2129.4
c.1 329.3
m.4 758.7
s.1 785.9
m.8 1563.0
s.2 1588.9

Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:

Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan MiB per second
1GB 0.5 core 24.9
2GB 1 core 31.4
4GB 2 cores 42.1
8GB 4 cores 58.6
12GB 6 cores 94.2
c.1 99.4
s.1 158.6
m.4 164.9
s.2 165.7
m.8 333.2

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for and LunaNode.

Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the and LunaNode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.

Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Plan Network Download Speed
1GB 0.5 core 452.4Mbps
2GB 1 core 453.7Mbps
12GB 6 cores 468.4Mbps
8GB 4 cores 476.7Mbps
4GB 2 cores 481.4Mbps
c.1 387.5Mbps
m.4 525.8Mbps
s.2 592.3Mbps
s.1 600.3Mbps
m.8 753.0Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for and LunaNode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.

Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.

Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Plan Average ops/hour
1GB 0.5 core 1512.6
2GB 1 core 3885.1
4GB 2 cores 3912.4
12GB 6 cores 8617.3
8GB 4 cores 14853.2
c.1 1239.0
m.4 2681.9
s.1 2776.1
m.8 5477.4
s.2 5881.9

Review and compare endurance test results for and LunaNode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.

Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).

Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average remote request duration
12GB 6 cores 503.2ms
2GB 1 core 510.0ms
8GB 4 cores 528.4ms
m.8 364.0ms
s.2 366.4ms
m.4 373.8ms
c.1 378.6ms
s.1 431.0ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for and LunaNode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.

Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee. Review LunaNode Review
Hourly Billing  Yes Yes
DDOS Protection  Yes No
Backups  No Yes
Control Panel  Custom Custom
SSH Keys Setup  No Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  1 3
Number of Datacenter Continents  1 2
Compare more and LunaNode Features


Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.

Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $2.

Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Best VPS 2020

Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks


Best VPS for $10 or less

List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.

New VDS line of servers at Contabo This week, [Contabo](/hosters/contabo) is releasing a new line of VPS servers called [VDS "Virtual ...
New Grades and Best VPS 2020 rankings Changes are coming to VPSBenchmarks in the next few weeks that will make it easier to find the VPS ...
How to choose a VPS Provider? ## Why does the VPS provider choice matter? Selecting a VPS provider is a difficult and important ...


Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at

Check out our pricing page and sign up


We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way for all providers irrespective of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
May 28 2020 OVHcloud
May 27 2020 Contabo
May 26 2020 IONOS by 1&1
May 25 2020
May 23 2020 Google Compute Engine
May 21 2020 Amazon EC2
May 20 2020 VPS2DAY
May 18 2020 Ramnode
May 16 2020 Amazon Lightsail
May 15 2020 Kamatera
May 14 2020 OVHcloud
May 13 2020 Linode