We have tested 11 VPS plans from DigitalOcean and UpCloud. This page is a summary and comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.
|Plan Name||Monthly Price||CPU cores||Memory (GB)||Disk Space (GB)||Data Transfer (GB)||Latest trial|
|Standard 1GB 1 core||$5.00||1||1.0||25||1000||Dec 03 2018|
|1GB 1core||$5.00||1||1.0||25||1000||Apr 22 2019|
|2GB 1core||$10.00||1||2.0||50||2000||Jan 23 2019|
|Standard 2GB 1 core||$10.00||1||2.0||50||2000||Jun 14 2019|
|Standard 1GB 3 cores||$15.00||3||1.0||60||3000||Aug 26 2019|
|Standard 4GB 2 cores||$20.00||2||4.0||80||4000||Oct 25 2018|
|4GB 2 cores||$20.00||2||4.0||80||4000||Jul 20 2019|
|CPU Optimized 4GB||$40.00||2||4.0||25||4000||Feb 03 2019|
|8GB 4 cores||$40.00||4||8.0||160||5000||Jun 10 2019|
|General Purpose 2 cores||$60.00||2||8.0||25||4000||Apr 05 2019|
|16GB 6 cores||$80.00||6||16.0||320||6000||Sep 01 2019|
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.
Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.
Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.
|Plan Name||Web Perf||Raw CPU Power||Perf Stability||Disk IO Perf||Network Perf|
Standard 1GB 1 core
Standard 2GB 1 core
Standard 1GB 3 cores
Standard 4GB 2 cores
4GB 2 cores
CPU Optimized 4GB
8GB 4 cores
General Purpose 2 cores
16GB 6 cores
This is the average time it took to create an instance for DigitalOcean and UpCloud from instance order to instance accepting connections.
|Number of instance creations in sample||6||8|
|Provisioning time in seconds||30s||55s|
The grades above are based on the following test results.
We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from DigitalOcean and UpCloud. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
|Provider||Plan||Average response time|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 1 core||73.0ms|
|DOcean||Standard 2GB 1 core||105.0ms|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 3 cores||83.0ms|
|DOcean||Standard 4GB 2 cores||55.0ms|
|DOcean||CPU Optimized 4GB||52.0ms|
|DOcean||General Purpose 2 cores||57.0ms|
|UpCloud||4GB 2 cores||79.0ms|
|UpCloud||8GB 4 cores||60.0ms|
|UpCloud||16GB 6 cores||51.0ms|
During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of DigitalOcean and UpCloud. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
|Provider||Plan||Operations per second|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 1 core||397.8|
|DOcean||Standard 2GB 1 core||395.6|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 3 cores||1012.5|
|DOcean||Standard 4GB 2 cores||744.9|
|DOcean||CPU Optimized 4GB||913.0|
|DOcean||General Purpose 2 cores||929.2|
|UpCloud||4GB 2 cores||727.9|
|UpCloud||8GB 4 cores||1617.8|
|UpCloud||16GB 6 cores||2843.8|
Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for DigitalOcean and UpCloud.
During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).
Remote Latency per Plan
Lower is better
|Provider||Plan||Average remote request duration|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 1 core||361.8ms|
|DOcean||Standard 2GB 1 core||359.0ms|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 3 cores||326.0ms|
|DOcean||Standard 4GB 2 cores||340.8ms|
|DOcean||CPU Optimized 4GB||364.8ms|
|DOcean||General Purpose 2 cores||370.2ms|
|UpCloud||4GB 2 cores||484.0ms|
|UpCloud||8GB 4 cores||499.4ms|
|UpCloud||16GB 6 cores||510.0ms|
We have performed large file transfers from the DigitalOcean and UpCloud VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.
The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.
Download Speed per Plan
Higher is better
|Provider||Plan||Network Download Speed|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 1 core||1390.9Mbps|
|DOcean||Standard 2GB 1 core||658.8Mbps|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 3 cores||211.8Mbps|
|DOcean||Standard 4GB 2 cores||1400.3Mbps|
|DOcean||CPU Optimized 4GB||567.4Mbps|
|DOcean||General Purpose 2 cores||404.1Mbps|
|UpCloud||4GB 2 cores||703.2Mbps|
|UpCloud||8GB 4 cores||790.3Mbps|
|UpCloud||16GB 6 cores||728.2Mbps|
We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.
This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.
Average number of operations per hour
Higher is better
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 1 core||3023.6|
|DOcean||Standard 2GB 1 core||2549.0|
|DOcean||Standard 1GB 3 cores||5835.2|
|DOcean||Standard 4GB 2 cores||5959.0|
|DOcean||CPU Optimized 4GB||7659.7|
|DOcean||General Purpose 2 cores||3709.1|
|UpCloud||4GB 2 cores||2974.4|
|UpCloud||8GB 4 cores||6014.8|
|UpCloud||16GB 6 cores||24448.2|
Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.
List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.
On June 10th 2019, Vultr announced the launch of [high frequency compute ...
Burstable CPUs VM instances appeared on Amazon EC2 for the first time in 2014. Since then, they have...
Finding the best cloud servers for your use case can be challenging. Most providers offer a number ...
We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way for all providers irrespective of our relationships with them.
If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.
All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks: