Kamatera vs LunaNode

Last updated on

We have tested 7 VPS plans from Kamatera and LunaNode. This page is a summary and comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.


Kamatera was founded in 1995.
It is headquartered in Israel.
It offers VPS managed and unmanaged hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • Hong Kong
  • Israel
  • Netherlands
  • UK
  • USA


LunaNode was founded in 2013.
It is headquartered in Canada.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • France

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core $4.00 1 1.0 20 5000 Aug 05 2019
LunaNode s.1 $7.00 2 1.0 20 2000 Aug 02 2019
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core $9.00 1 1.0 20 5000 May 21 2019
LunaNode s.2 $14.00 4 2.0 35 2500 Mar 04 2019
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores $19.00 2 1.0 20 5000 Jan 11 2019
LunaNode c.1 $20.00 1 5.0 100 3000 May 13 2019
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores $50.00 4 2.0 20 5000 Mar 11 2019

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core
LunaNode s.1
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core
LunaNode s.2
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores
LunaNode c.1
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for Kamatera and LunaNode from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

Kamatera LunaNode
Number of instance creations in sample 4 4
Provisioning time in seconds 412s 55s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.

Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from Kamatera and LunaNode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.

Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average response time
LunaNode s.1 74.0ms
LunaNode s.2 66.0ms
LunaNode c.1 101.0ms
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core 73.0ms
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core 63.0ms
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores 64.0ms
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores 80.0ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.

Sysbench CPU Performances

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Kamatera and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:

Rate of operations

Higher is better

Provider Plan Operations per second
LunaNode s.1 788.2
LunaNode s.2 1602.1
LunaNode c.1 330.4
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core 395.2
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core 391.7
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores 817.5
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores 1318.2

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for Kamatera and LunaNode.

Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).

Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Provider Plan Average remote request duration
LunaNode s.1 376.6ms
LunaNode s.2 373.2ms
LunaNode c.1 388.4ms
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core 333.0ms
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core 494.8ms
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores 347.6ms
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores 341.8ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for Kamatera and LunaNode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.

Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the Kamatera and LunaNode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.

Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Provider Plan Network Download Speed
LunaNode s.1 324.4Mbps
LunaNode s.2 532.9Mbps
LunaNode c.1 405.6Mbps
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core 1428.2Mbps
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core 2146.9Mbps
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores 1006.4Mbps
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores 1051.5Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for Kamatera and LunaNode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.

Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.

Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Provider Plan Average ops/hour
LunaNode s.1 2886.8
LunaNode s.2 5933.1
LunaNode c.1 1327.8
Kamatera Availability 1GB 1core 2225.8
Kamatera General 1GB 1 core 1630.8
Kamatera General 1GB 2 cores 4549.5
Kamatera General 2GB 4 cores 5307.4

Review and compare endurance test results for Kamatera and LunaNode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.

Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.

LunaNode Review Kamatera Review
Hourly Billing  Yes Yes
DDOS Protection  No No
Backups  Yes No
Control Panel  Custom Custom
SSH Keys Setup  Yes No
Total Number of Datacenters  3 13
Number of Datacenter Continents  2 4

Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.

Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Best VPS Summer 2019

Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks


vpsbenchmarks.com is hosted by:

Cheap Powerful VPS


Best VPS for $10 or less

List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.

Vultr High Frequency Compute Instances

On June 10th 2019, Vultr announced the launch of [high frequency compute ...

Evaluating cloud server performance with sysbench

Finding the best cloud servers for your use case can be challenging. Most providers offer a number ...

GDPR Compliance in the Cloud

On May 25, 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect. This new set of ...


Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up


We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way for all providers irrespective of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Sep 30 2019 Hetzner
Sep 27 2019 Vpsdime
Sep 24 2019 Aruba Cloud
Sep 22 2019 Dreamhost
Sep 18 2019 Clouding.io
Sep 16 2019 Microsoft Azure
Sep 13 2019 AtlanticNet
Sep 10 2019 Linode
Sep 07 2019 Alibaba Cloud
Sep 03 2019 Contabo
Sep 01 2019 UpCloud
Aug 29 2019 1and1 IONOS