LunaNode vs Vultr
Go to provider selection to start a new comparison
We have tested 15 VPS plans from LunaNode and Vultr. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those providers.
LunaNode
Vultr
VPS Plans
| Plan Name | Monthly Price | CPU cores | Memory (GB) | Disk Space (GB) | Data Transfer (GB) | Latest trial | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
m.1s | $3.50 | 1 | 1.0 | 15 | 1000 | Sep 24 2020 |
|
|
VC2 1GB $5 | $5.00 | 1 | 1.0 | 25 | 1000 | Jun 05 2021 |
|
|
High Frequency 1GB | $6.00 | 1 | 1.0 | 32 | 1000 | Mar 08 2021 |
|
|
m.2 | $7.00 | 1 | 2.0 | 20 | 2000 | Feb 23 2021 |
|
|
VC2 2GB $10 | $10.00 | 1 | 2.0 | 55 | 2000 | Dec 09 2020 |
|
|
High Frequency 2GB (Off rankings) | $12.00 | 1 | 2.0 | 64 | 2000 | May 12 2020 |
|
|
m.4 | $14.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 35 | 2500 | May 06 2021 |
|
|
c.1 | $20.00 | 1 | 5.0 | 100 | 3000 | Dec 08 2020 |
|
|
VC2 4GB $20 | $20.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 80 | 3000 | Apr 21 2021 |
|
|
High Frequency 4GB | $24.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 128 | 3000 | Sep 07 2021 |
|
|
m.8 | $28.00 | 4 | 8.0 | 70 | 3000 | Jul 21 2021 |
|
|
VC2 8GB 4 cores | $40.00 | 4 | 8.0 | 160 | 4000 | Jan 24 2021 |
|
|
m.16 | $56.00 | 6 | 16.0 | 125 | 4000 | Jul 11 2020 |
|
|
VC2 16GB 6 cores | $80.00 | 6 | 16.0 | 320 | 5000 | Oct 26 2020 |
|
|
High Frequency 16GB | $96.00 | 4 | 16.0 | 384 | 5000 | Jul 20 2021 |
Compare specs for all plans from all providers
Note: "Off rankings" plans are not included in the Screener and are not considered for Best VPS rankings. They may either be previews where the VPS have been directly provisioned by the provider or they may exceed the maximum number of plans that can be listed per provider.
Performance Grades
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.
Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.
Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.
Screen all VPS from LunaNode and Vultr| Plan Name | Web Perf | Raw CPU Power | Perf Stability | Disk IO Perf | Network Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
m.1s
$3.50 |
F | F | E | E | F |
|
|
VC2 1GB $5
$5.00 |
E | E | E | B | D |
|
|
High Frequency 1GB
$6.00 |
C | E | C | B | E |
|
|
m.2
$7.00 |
E | E | C | C | D |
|
|
VC2 2GB $10
$10.00 |
E | E | D | B | A |
|
|
High Frequency 2GB (Off rankings)
$12.00 |
C | E | C | B | B |
|
|
m.4
$14.00 |
C | D | D | C | D |
|
|
c.1
$20.00 |
F | F | E | F | E |
|
|
VC2 4GB $20
$20.00 |
E | D | C | C | B |
|
|
High Frequency 4GB
$24.00 |
B | C | A | B | B |
|
|
m.8
$28.00 |
C | B | C | D | C |
|
|
VC2 8GB 4 cores
$40.00 |
C | B | D | B | B |
|
|
m.16
$56.00 |
D | A | D | C | E |
|
|
VC2 16GB 6 cores
$80.00 |
D | B | D | C | C |
|
|
High Frequency 16GB
$96.00 |
A | A | C | A | B |
Features and Datacenters
This list is a subset of the features each provider may offer.
CPUs
These are the CPUs we have seen in LunaNode and Vultr instances in the past 18 months.
| All LunaNode CPUs | All Vultr CPUs |
|
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz |
Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, no TSX, IBRS) Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS) Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake) Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS) |
Performance Consistency
The provider consistency score shows how much variation can be expected between 2 servers of the same type at the same provider. A high consistency score (>65) means the performance of all servers of the provider is consistent over many trials and many plans.
Providers who don't have enough data yet at VPSBenchmarks don't have a consistency score.
Screenshots
VPS Instance Provisioning Time
This is the average time it took to create an instance for LunaNode and Vultr from instance order to instance accepting connections.
| LunaNode | Vultr | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of instance creations in sample | 8 | 14 |
| Average provisioning time | 51s | 58s |
Performance in Depth...
These are some of the test results that are used to determine the grades above.
Web Response Times
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from LunaNode and Vultr. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
Maximum HTTP Load
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from LunaNode and Vultr. This is the maximum rate of HTTP requests that each server handled without timing out.
Maximum HTTP request rate
Higher is better
Sysbench CPU Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of LunaNode and Vultr. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Sysbench Disk IO Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of LunaNode and Vultr. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for LunaNode and Vultr.
Network Transfers
We have performed large file transfers from the LunaNode and Vultr VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.
The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.
Download Speed per Plan
Higher is better
Sustained CPU Endurance Tests
We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.
This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.
Average number of operations per hour
Higher is better
Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?
Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.
Compare LunaNode and Vultr against other providers
Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers
With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.
Run your first Private Trial for just $2.
Select 2 VPS providers for comparison
Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks
-
All tests results are in for Aruba S.p.A. Cloud VPS Medium: 6.50€ #VPS, 1 cores, 2.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/aruba_c… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-18 00:12:09 UTC![]()
-
New trial started for Aruba S.p.A. Cloud VPS Medium: 6.50€ #VPS, 1 cores, 2.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/aruba_c… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-16 23:10:26 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for IDrive Online Backup Shared 4 cores 8GB: $40.00 #VPS, 4 cores, 8.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/idrive_… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-15 23:51:04 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for Togglebox 1GB 1core: $9.45 #VPS, 1 cores, 1.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/toggleb… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-14 22:43:54 UTC![]()
-
New trial started for IDrive Online Backup Shared 4 cores 8GB: $40.00 #VPS, 4 cores, 8.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/idrive_… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-14 22:38:45 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for KLikK 8GB 4 cores: 47.44€ #VPS, 4 cores, 8.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/klikk_p… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-09-14 01:07:01 UTC![]()
