Kamatera vs TransIP

Last updated on

Go to provider selection to start a new comparison

We have tested 14 VPS plans from Kamatera and TransIP. We'll show which one is best based on a detailed performance analysis, on features and prices.


Kamatera

Kamatera

Kamatera was founded as a VPS provider in 1995.
It is headquartered in Israel.
It offers VPS managed and unmanaged hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • Hong Kong
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

TransIP

TransIP

TransIP was founded as a VPS provider in 2003.
It is headquartered in Netherlands.
It employs 15 people.

It has datacenters in:
  • Netherlands

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
Availability 1GB 1core $4.00 1 1.0 20 5000 Nov 05 2023
Availability 2GB 1 core $6.00 1 2.0 20 5000 Sep 20 2023
BladeVPS XS 6.99€ 1 1.0 25 1000 May 20 2024
General 1GB 1 core $9.00 1 1.0 20 5000 Feb 07 2024
General 2GB 1 core $15.00 1 2.0 20 5000 Jun 20 2023
BladeVPS X2 14.50€ 1 2.0 75 2000 Oct 09 2023
Availability 4GB 2 cores $19.00 2 4.0 40 5000 Mar 27 2024
BladeVPS X4 25.99€ 2 4.0 150 5000 Jan 12 2024
PerformanceVPS C2 34.50€ 2 4.0 100 5000 Aug 13 2023
General 4GB 2 cores $42.00 2 4.0 40 5000 Aug 05 2023
BladeVPS X8 67.99€ 4 8.0 320 10000 Mar 05 2024
PerformanceVPS C4 73.50€ 4 8.0 200 10000 Nov 24 2023
General 8GB 4 cores $90.00 4 8.0 80 5000 Dec 20 2023
Availability 16GB 8 cores $99.00 8 16.0 150 5000 May 13 2024

Compare specs for all plans from all providers

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Screen all VPS from Kamatera and TransIP
Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
Availability 1GB 1core
$4.00
C F E B C
Availability 2GB 1 core
$6.00
C F D A D
BladeVPS XS
6.99€
F F E E D
General 1GB 1 core
$9.00
D F D B B
General 2GB 1 core
$15.00
E E C B C
BladeVPS X2
14.50€
E F C E D
Availability 4GB 2 cores
$19.00
D E E B B
BladeVPS X4
25.99€
F E E F C
PerformanceVPS C2
34.50€
C D B E C
General 4GB 2 cores
$42.00
D D C B C
BladeVPS X8
67.99€
E C E E C
PerformanceVPS C4
73.50€
C C B E B
General 8GB 4 cores
$90.00
B C B A B
Availability 16GB 8 cores
$99.00
C C E B B
Show Price Weighted Grades   

Features and Datacenters

This list is a subset of the features each provider may offer.

Kamatera TransIP
Backups  Yes Yes
Block storage  Yes Yes
Object storage  No No
Load balancer  Yes Yes
DDoS protection  Yes Yes
Hourly Billing  Yes No
SSH Keys Setup  No Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  21 2
Number of Datacenter Continents  4 1
Compare more Kamatera and TransIP Features

CPUs

These are the CPUs we have seen in Kamatera and TransIP instances in the past 18 months.

Kamatera TransIP
All Kamatera CPUs by plan All TransIP CPUs by plan
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358P CPU @ 2.60GHz AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB)
Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake)

Performance Consistency

The provider consistency score shows how much variation can be expected between 2 servers of the same type at the same provider. A high consistency score (>65) means the performance of all servers of the provider is consistent over many trials and many plans.

Providers who don't have enough data yet at VPSBenchmarks don't have a consistency score.

Kamatera TransIP
Consistency Score 51 48

Screenshots


VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for Kamatera and TransIP from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

Kamatera TransIP
Number of instance creations in sample 11 5
Average provisioning time 299s 108s

Performance in Depth...

These are some of the test results that are used to determine the grades above.

Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from Kamatera and TransIP. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better


Maximum HTTP Load

We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from Kamatera and TransIP. This is the maximum rate of HTTP requests that each server handled without timing out.



Maximum HTTP request rate

Higher is better


During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, rate metrics and CPU metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.

Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Kamatera and TransIP. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better


Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Kamatera and TransIP. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for Kamatera and TransIP.

Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the Kamatera and TransIP VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for Kamatera and TransIP on the Network Transfers Comparison page.

Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.

Throughput variations of the endurance test over 24 hours. The coefficient of variation is the standard deviation of the test throughput divided by its average value. Low variations mean that resources allocated to the server were stable for the duration of the test and there was little contention.


Ops/hour coefficient of variation

Lower is better

Review and compare endurance test results for Kamatera and TransIP on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.

Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.


Compare Kamatera and TransIP against other providers



Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $4.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

Be the first to learn about new Best VPS rankings. Subscribe to our newsletter.