Bluehost vs IO Zoom

Bluehost
IOZoom
Last updated on

We have tested 4 VPS plans from Bluehost and IO Zoom. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.


Bluehost

Bluehost was founded in 2003.
It is headquartered in Orem, Utah and the USA.
It employs 750 people.
It offers Shared, VPS and Dedicated hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • USA

IO Zoom

IO Zoom was founded in 2015.
It is headquartered in the USA.
It offers VPS and Wordpress hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • USA

Best VPS Awards

3rd Best VPS February 2019

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
Cloud 1GB $5.00 1 1.0 20 1000 Dec 13 2019
KVM 2GB $8.00 1 2.0 20 2000 Dec 18 2018
Standard 2GB $29.99 2 2.0 30 1000 Mar 09 2020
KVM 8GB $30.00 4 8.0 80 6000 Feb 06 2019

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
Cloud 1GB
$5.00
F F C C F
KVM 2GB
$8.00
E F D D D
Standard 2GB
$29.99
D D C C D
KVM 8GB
$30.00
E B C B D
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for Bluehost and IO Zoom from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

Bluehost IO Zoom
Number of instance creations in sample 1 3
Provisioning time in seconds 86400s 2933s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.


Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from Bluehost and IO Zoom. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average response time
IOZoom
KVM 8GB 84.0ms
KVM 2GB 92.0ms
Cloud 1GB 101.0ms
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 88.0ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.


Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Bluehost and IO Zoom. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan Operations per second
IOZoom
Cloud 1GB 256.3
KVM 2GB 291.5
KVM 8GB 1135.8
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 580.3

Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Bluehost and IO Zoom. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan MiB per second
IOZoom
Cloud 1GB 29.7
KVM 2GB 47.6
KVM 8GB 183.9
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 180.7

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for Bluehost and IO Zoom.


Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the Bluehost and IO Zoom VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Plan Network Download Speed
IOZoom
Cloud 1GB 95.9Mbps
KVM 8GB 224.6Mbps
KVM 2GB 276.0Mbps
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 621.8Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for Bluehost and IO Zoom on the Network Transfers Comparison page.


Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.


Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Plan Average ops/hour
IOZoom
KVM 2GB 898.2
Cloud 1GB 1174.8
KVM 8GB 4125.4
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 2720.5

Review and compare endurance test results for Bluehost and IO Zoom on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.


Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).


Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average remote request duration
IOZoom
KVM 8GB 337.6ms
Cloud 1GB 341.6ms
KVM 2GB 376.4ms
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 345.0ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for Bluehost and IO Zoom on the Remote Timings Comparison page.


Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.

IO Zoom Review Bluehost Review
Hourly Billing  No No
DDOS Protection  Yes Yes
Backups  Yes Yes
Control Panel  Builtin Custom
SSH Keys Setup  No Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  5 1
Number of Datacenter Continents  1 1
Compare more Bluehost and IO Zoom Features

Screenshots


Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.




Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $2.0.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

VPS Screener

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds with the Screener


Screener

Best VPS 2020


Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks

News

Best VPS for $10 or less

List of the best Virtual Private Servers, performance tested, that will cost you $10 or less per month.


New VDS line of servers at Contabo This week, [Contabo](/hosters/contabo) is releasing a new line of VPS servers called [VDS "Virtual ...
New Grades and Best VPS 2020 rankings Changes are coming to VPSBenchmarks in the next few weeks that will make it easier to find the VPS ...
How to choose a VPS Provider? ## Why does the VPS provider choice matter? Selecting a VPS provider is a difficult and important ...

More...

Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up

Disclaimer

We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way for all providers irrespective of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by make your hosting purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Jun 01 2020 Atlantic.Net
May 29 2020 Genesis VMs
May 28 2020 OVHcloud
May 27 2020 Contabo
May 26 2020 IONOS by 1&1
May 25 2020 Clouding.io
May 23 2020 Google Compute Engine
May 21 2020 Amazon EC2
May 20 2020 VPS2DAY
May 18 2020 Ramnode
May 16 2020 Amazon Lightsail
May 15 2020 Kamatera