Bluehost vs LunaNode

Bluehost
LunaNode
Last updated on

We have tested 7 VPS plans from Bluehost and LunaNode. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those 2 providers.


Bluehost

Bluehost was founded in 2003.
It is headquartered in Orem, Utah and the USA.
It employs 750 people.
It offers Shared, VPS and Dedicated hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • United States

LunaNode

LunaNode was founded in 2013.
It is headquartered in Canada.
It offers VPS hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Canada
  • France

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
s.1 $7.00 2 1.0 20 2000 Feb 09 2020
s.2 $14.00 4 2.0 35 2500 Dec 16 2019
m.4 $14.00 2 4.0 35 2500 Mar 31 2020
c.1 $20.00 1 5.0 100 3000 Oct 15 2019
m.8 $28.00 4 8.0 70 3000 May 05 2020
Standard 2GB $29.99 2 2.0 30 1000 Mar 09 2020
m.16 $56.00 6 16.0 125 4000 Jul 11 2020

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
s.1
$7.00
D C D B C
s.2
$14.00
C A D B C
m.4
$14.00
D C D B D
c.1
$20.00
F E D D D
m.8
$28.00
C B D C C
Standard 2GB
$29.99
D D C C D
m.16
$56.00
D A D C E
Show Price Weighted Grades   

VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for Bluehost and LunaNode from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

Bluehost LunaNode
Number of instance creations in sample 1 9
Provisioning time in seconds 86400s 41s

In Depth...

The grades above are based on the following test results.


Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application with ~100,000 hits per day for several days on cloud servers from Bluehost and LunaNode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average response time
LunaNode
m.8 67.7ms
s.1 70.2ms
m.4 70.4ms
s.2 72.5ms
m.16 79.7ms
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 71.3ms

During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, CPU metrics and database performance metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.


Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Bluehost and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan Operations per second
LunaNode
c.1 329.3
m.4 758.7
s.1 785.9
m.8 1563.0
s.2 1588.9
m.16 1887.6
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 580.3

Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Bluehost and LunaNode. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Plan MiB per second
LunaNode
c.1 99.4
m.16 123.1
s.1 158.6
m.4 164.9
s.2 165.7
m.8 333.2
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 180.7

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.

Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for Bluehost and LunaNode.


Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the Bluehost and LunaNode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Plan Network Download Speed
LunaNode
m.16 299.6Mbps
c.1 387.5Mbps
m.4 525.8Mbps
s.2 592.3Mbps
s.1 600.3Mbps
m.8 753.0Mbps
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 621.8Mbps

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for Bluehost and LunaNode on the Network Transfers Comparison page.


Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.


Average number of operations per hour

Higher is better

Plan Average ops/hour
LunaNode
c.1 1239.0
m.4 2681.9
s.1 2776.1
m.8 5477.4
s.2 5881.9
m.16 8168.7
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 2720.5

Review and compare endurance test results for Bluehost and LunaNode on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.


Remote Timings

During the entire duration of the web performance test, we collected web response times from 5 different locations in the world. The chart below reports the connection establishment time + TLS handshake latency from all 5 locations. (That excludes the time spent on the server that is already measured in web response times above and it also excludes the DNS resolution time since it is not dependent on the provider).


Remote Latency per Plan

Lower is better

Plan Average remote request duration
LunaNode
m.8 364.0ms
s.2 366.4ms
m.4 373.8ms
c.1 378.6ms
s.1 431.0ms
Bluehost
Standard 2GB 345.0ms

Detailed remote timings measurements including connection time, TLS handshake time, and response time can be compared for Bluehost and LunaNode on the Remote Timings Comparison page.


Features and Usability

Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.

LunaNode Review Bluehost Review
Hourly Billing  Yes No
DDOS Protection  No Yes
Backups  Yes Yes
Control Panel  Custom Custom
SSH Keys Setup  Yes Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  3 1
Number of Datacenter Continents  2 1
Compare more Bluehost and LunaNode Features

Screenshots


Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.




Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $2.0.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

Screeners

VPS Screener

Find the VPS that fits your requirements in seconds


Screener

Best VPS 2020

Provider Finder


Share this page

Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks

News

Investigating the network upload speeds Since the beginning, all network transfer tests at vpsbenchmarks.com had that strange characteristic...
First EC2 C5a EPYC 2nd Gen benchmarks On June 5th 2020, Amazon EC2 made their new C5a instances generally available. Those instances are ...
New VDS line of servers at Contabo This week, Contabo is releasing a new line of VPS servers called VDS "Virtual ...

More...

Be featured on VPSBenchmarks

Cloud Server Providers, would you like your products to be tested at vpsbenchmarks.com?

Check out our pricing page and sign up

Disclaimer

We are proud to provide objective and impartial benchmark data on this website. VPSBenchmarks receives support from some of the providers featured here but all tests are conducted the same way regardless of our relationships with them.

If you find our benchmarks valuable, you can help by making your cloud purchases using the Provider Affiliate Buttons displayed throughout the site.

Latest trials

All tests that were recently conducted at VpsBenchmarks:

Start Provider
Aug 07 2020 Ramnode
Aug 06 2020 Kamatera
Aug 04 2020 Aruba Cloud
Aug 03 2020 Togglebox
Aug 02 2020 Vultr
Jul 30 2020 UpCloud
Jul 29 2020 MaxKVM
Jul 27 2020 Genesis VMs
Jul 26 2020 Amazon EC2
Jul 24 2020 LayerStack
Jul 21 2020 Google Compute Engine
Jul 19 2020 Amazon Lightsail