IO Zoom vs Linode
Go to provider selection to start a new comparison
We have tested 7 VPS plans from IO Zoom and Linode. This page is a summary and a comparison of all test results for those providers.
Linode
VPS Plans
| Plan Name | Monthly Price | CPU cores | Memory (GB) | Disk Space (GB) | Data Transfer (GB) | Latest trial | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1GB $5 | $5.00 | 1 | 1.0 | 25 | 1000 | Dec 11 2020 |
|
KVM 2GB | $8.00 | 2 | 2.0 | 20 | 2000 | Feb 01 2021 |
|
|
2GB $10 | $10.00 | 1 | 2.0 | 50 | 2000 | May 02 2020 |
|
|
4GB $20 | $20.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 80 | 4000 | Sep 27 2020 |
|
|
Dedicated 4GB | $30.00 | 2 | 4.0 | 80 | 4000 | Feb 25 2021 |
|
|
8GB $40 | $40.00 | 4 | 8.0 | 160 | 5000 | Jul 15 2020 |
|
|
Dedicated 8GB | $60.00 | 4 | 8.0 | 160 | 5000 | May 11 2021 |
Compare specs for all plans from all providers
Performance Grades
To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.
Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.
Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.
Screen all VPS from IO Zoom and Linode| Plan Name | Web Perf | Raw CPU Power | Perf Stability | Disk IO Perf | Network Perf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1GB $5
$5.00 |
E | E | F | D | C |
|
|
KVM 2GB
$8.00 |
E | E | D | C | F |
|
|
2GB $10
$10.00 |
E | E | C | C | C |
|
|
4GB $20
$20.00 |
B | B | C | A | B |
|
|
Dedicated 4GB
$30.00 |
E | D | D | B | B |
|
|
8GB $40
$40.00 |
E | B | D | C | C |
|
|
Dedicated 8GB
$60.00 |
D | B | D | C | C |
CPUs
These are the CPUs we have seen in IO Zoom and Linode instances in the past 18 months.
| All IO Zoom CPUs | All Linode CPUs |
| QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) |
AMD EPYC 7501 32-Core Processor AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz |
VPS Instance Provisioning Time
This is the average time it took to create an instance for IO Zoom and Linode from instance order to instance accepting connections.
| IO Zoom | Linode | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of instance creations in sample | 1 | 9 |
| Average provisioning time | 28800s | 54s |
In Depth...
These are some of the test results that make up the grades above.
Web Response Times
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from IO Zoom and Linode. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.
Local Response Time per Plan
Lower is better
Maximum HTTP Load
We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from IO Zoom and Linode. This is the maximum rate of HTTP requests that each server handled without error.
Maximum HTTP request rate
Higher is better
Sysbench CPU Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of IO Zoom and Linode. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Sysbench Disk IO Performance
We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of IO Zoom and Linode. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:
Rate of operations
Higher is better
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for IO Zoom and Linode.
Network Transfers
We have performed large file transfers from the IO Zoom and Linode VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.
The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.
Download Speed per Plan
Higher is better
Sustained CPU Endurance Tests
We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.
This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.
Average number of operations per hour
Higher is better
Features and Usability
Features not included in the VPS price of the plan will be marked as missing but they may be available for the fee.
| Linode Review | IO Zoom Review | |
|---|---|---|
| Hourly Billing | Yes | No |
| DDOS Protection | Yes | Yes |
| Backups | No | Yes |
| Control Panel | Builtin | Builtin |
| SSH Keys Setup | Yes | No |
| Total Number of Datacenters | 11 | 5 |
| Number of Datacenter Continents | 4 | 1 |
Screenshots
Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?
Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.
Compare IO Zoom and Linode against other providers
Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers
With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.
Run your first Private Trial for just $2.
Select 2 VPS providers for comparison
Latest Tweets by @vpsbenchmarks
-
New trial started for MaxKVM SKVM-4G: $12.00 #VPS, 2 cores, 4.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/maxkvm_… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-09 09:59:40 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for HostUp SSD VPS #4: $40.00 #VPS, 4 cores, 8.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/hostup_… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-08 15:09:48 UTC![]()
-
New trial started for HostUp SSD VPS #4: $40.00 #VPS, 4 cores, 8.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/hostup_… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-07 13:59:53 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for Vultr VC2 1GB $5: $5.00 #VPS, 1 cores, 1.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/vultr_p… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-07 00:14:28 UTC![]()
-
New trial started for Vultr VC2 1GB $5: $5.00 #VPS, 1 cores, 1.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/vultr_p… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-05 23:22:30 UTC![]()
-
All tests results are in for UpCloud 16GB 6 cores: $80.00 #VPS, 6 cores, 16.0GB vpsbenchmarks.com/trials/upcloud… #cloudcomputing
VPSBenchmarks
2021-06-04 23:35:53 UTC![]()
