Katapult vs ScalaHosting

Last updated on

Go to provider selection to start a new comparison

We have tested 9 VPS plans from Katapult and ScalaHosting. We'll show which one is best based on a detailed performance analysis, on features and prices.


Katapult

Katapult

Katapult was founded as a VPS provider in 2020.
It is headquartered in the United Kingdom.
It employs 65 people.
It offers Virtual machines, Storage and Networking hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Netherlands
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

ScalaHosting

ScalaHosting

ScalaHosting was founded as a VPS provider in 2007.
It is headquartered in the United States.
It employs 55 people.
It offers Managed Hosting, VPS, Web Hosting and Wordpress hosting products.

It has datacenters in:
  • Australia
  • Bulgaria
  • Finland
  • Germany
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Singapore
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

Best VPS Awards

3rd Best VPS February 2024

VPS Plans

Plan Name Monthly Price CPU cores Memory (GB) Disk Space (GB) Data Transfer (GB) Latest trial
ROCK-3 £15.00 1 3.0 25 2000 Jul 05 2024
Build #1 $24.95 2 4.0 50 3000 May 26 2024
ROCK-3 Dedicated £26.25 1 3.0 25 2000 Dec 05 2024
ROCK-6 £30.00 2 6.0 50 3000 Feb 06 2024
Build #2 $49.95 4 8.0 100 3000 Jul 11 2024
ROCK-6 Dedicated £52.50 2 6.0 50 3000 Sep 20 2024
6 cores 12GB $71.95 6 12.0 120 3000 Oct 12 2024
ROCK-12 £60.00 4 12.0 100 4000 Apr 20 2024
Build #3 $95.95 8 16.0 160 3000 Aug 26 2024

Compare specs for all plans from all providers

Performance Grades

To summarize the performance of each VPS plan, we generated grades based on the various tests that were run: web, sysbench, endurance and remote timing tests. Each grade focuses on one aspect of the VPS speed or stability (cpu, disk IO, network IO...) and is made of one or more metrics measured during the tests.

Grades are evenly distributed between A and F. A is best, F is worst.

Follow the letter links to find the test results backing the grade.

How are grades calculated?

Screen all VPS from Katapult and ScalaHosting
Plan Name Web Perf Raw CPU Power Perf Stability Disk IO Perf Network Perf
ROCK-3
£15.00
D F E C C
Build #1
$24.95
B D C C F
ROCK-3 Dedicated
£26.25
C E E C C
ROCK-6
£30.00
C C D B C
Build #2
$49.95
E D D D F
ROCK-6 Dedicated
£52.50
B D C C C
6 cores 12GB
$71.95
A C A C F
ROCK-12
£60.00
C B C C C
Build #3
$95.95
C B B B F
Show Price Weighted Grades   

Features and Datacenters

This list is a subset of the features each provider may offer.

ScalaHosting Katapult
Backups  Yes Yes
Block storage  No Yes
Object storage  No No
Load balancer  Yes Yes
DDoS protection  Yes Yes
Hourly Billing  No Yes
SSH Keys Setup  No Yes
Total Number of Datacenters  13 4
Number of Datacenter Continents  4 2
Compare more Katapult and ScalaHosting Features

CPUs

These are the CPUs we have seen in Katapult and ScalaHosting instances in the past 18 months.

Katapult ScalaHosting
All Katapult CPUs by plan All ScalaHosting CPUs by plan
AMD EPYC 9354 32-Core Processor
AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, no TSX, IBRS)
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS)

Performance Consistency

The provider consistency score shows how much variation can be expected between 2 servers of the same type at the same provider. A high consistency score (>65) means the performance of all servers of the provider is consistent over many trials and many plans.

Providers who don't have enough data yet at VPSBenchmarks don't have a consistency score.

Katapult ScalaHosting
Consistency Score 71 50

Screenshots


VPS Instance Provisioning Time

This is the average time it took to create an instance for Katapult and ScalaHosting from instance order to instance accepting connections.

All VPS provisioning times

Katapult ScalaHosting
Number of instance creations in sample 5 12
Average provisioning time 37s 222s

Performance in Depth...

These are some of the test results that are used to determine the grades above.

Web Response Times

We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from Katapult and ScalaHosting. This is the average response time measured locally on the VPS for each plan we tested.



Local Response Time per Plan

Lower is better


Maximum HTTP Load

We ran a database intensive web application at various levels of load on cloud servers from Katapult and ScalaHosting. This is the maximum rate of HTTP requests that each server handled without timing out.



Maximum HTTP request rate

Higher is better


During the Web Test, we collect response time metrics, rate metrics and CPU metrics. All of those are measured locally on the VPS running the web server. All metrics can be compared on the Web Performance Comparison page.

Sysbench CPU Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Katapult and ScalaHosting. These are the Sysbench CPU test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better


Sysbench Disk IO Performance

We ran the full suite of Sysbench tests on VPS plans of Katapult and ScalaHosting. These are the Sysbench Disk IO Random Read test results:



Rate of operations

Higher is better

Sysbench test results are also available for random disk IO tests, sequential disk IO tests and memory tests.
Review and compare all Sysbench numbers on the Sysbench Comparison page for Katapult and ScalaHosting.

Network Transfers

We have performed large file transfers from the Katapult and ScalaHosting VPS and we measured the speed of downloads and uploads.

The transfers involve multiple files, 10 threads and last for at least 10 seconds at maximum speed. The transfers are repeated 3 times from different servers and only the fastest transfer is reported here.


Download Speed per Plan

Higher is better

Network Transfers measurements including download and upload speeds can be compared for Katapult and ScalaHosting on the Network Transfers Comparison page.

Sustained CPU Endurance Tests

We pushed the CPU of those VPS plans hard for 24 hours straight.

This test shows how fast the VPS can go for long periods of time, how stable the performance is and it also gives clues on how overallocated the VPSs may be.

Throughput variations of the endurance test over 24 hours. The coefficient of variation is the standard deviation of the test throughput divided by its average value. Low variations mean that resources allocated to the server were stable for the duration of the test and there was little contention.


Ops/hour coefficient of variation

Lower is better

Review and compare endurance test results for Katapult and ScalaHosting on the Sustained CPU Endurance Comparison page.

Having trouble finding the VPS that fits your needs?

Use the VPS Screener to quickly zero in on the specifications, performance and price that you're looking for.


Compare Katapult and ScalaHosting against other providers



Run VPSBenchmarks on your own servers

With "Private Trials", the same benchmarks that run on all VPS at vpsbenchmarks.com will run on the servers of your choice. The results are private and you will be able to compare them to any other public benchmark on this website.

Run your first Private Trial for just $4.



Select 2 VPS providers for comparison

Be the first to learn about new Best VPS rankings. Subscribe to our newsletter.